Is it time to virtualize and centralize the resources so users can access “the desktop” from anywhere using anything, or does the venerable old workhorse still have a place in the modern organization?
, Network World Editor in Chief, sets up the debates and recruits the experts. Contact him with thoughts and ideas, .
argues that the time for virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) is now because the technology can help companies deal with BYOD and also contend with natural disasters.
says not so fast. While the success of server virtualization makes VDI tempting, the latter will effect a much larger group that will challenge your organizational and IT readiness.
Some contend that BYOD has taken off because employees want experiences that IT can't deliver, and the BYOD success is a sign that IT's influence is eroding. Poppycock, say others. Critical new technologies are constantly emerging and the role of technology in business success has never been greater. If anything, they say, IT's influence is expanding.
View Debate »go to commentsIf you are going with public cloud services, there is a certain appeal to centralizing your apps with as few suppliers as possible to minimize the management overhead. But given the recent outages with Amazon and other leading players, some observers say you’re better off using a multi-cloud sourcing strategy. What’s more, a slew of specialized SaaS offerings are emerging that give you the option of taking a best of breed approach. Experts argue opposing views about cloud sourcing strategy.
View Debate »go to commentsThe BYOD craze is sweeping organizations everywhere, but questions abound, everything from security and compliance to cost control/management.While BYOD lets IT piggyback on user enthusiasm for new productivity tools, is the risk worth it?
View Debate »go to commentsOrganizations are gaining confidence in cloud computing, although questions still swirl around everything from basic security and compliance controls to issues regarding supplier viability, ROI and, given the prominent outages of late, simple availability.
View Debate »go to commentsTraining is often cited as a critical component of the security puzzle because no security system is foolproof and users need to know the critical role they play. But others argue that too many security professionals rely on training as a cop out, a way to duck responsibility and blame, and that the nature of attacks today make training superfluous.
View Debate »go to commentsThere are many things that are easier to do in the cloud, but is security one of them? Proponents argue that basing security tools in the cloud provide all the benefits of any cloud-based resource, including low cost of entry, simplicity of maintenance/upgrades, etc. But critics say not so fast. Getting security is hard enough when you control all the resources. Moving them to the cloud just further complicates the job.
View Debate »go to commentsAge vs. experience? The argument dates back years and will likely never be resolved, but in the world of high tech, where firms are clamoring for IT skills and yet there are displaced workers looking for jobs, the debate rages on. Do you go with the veteran whose wisdom has been refined by years of experience, or the young hot shot that has the latest tech chops?
View Debate »go to commentsThe explosion of smart mobile devices brings with it unparalleled enterprise risk. It is hard enough to secure corporate resources when they are in IT’s glass house, or at least on the company grounds. What to do when suddenly the tools, data and applications go wandering? The most fundamental question: Do you secure the device, or put your trust in network defenses?
View Debate »go to commentsFabric is one of the hottest topics in the data center, and with good reason. Virtualization of data center resources, an explosion of server-to-server traffic, and ever increasing application demands are stressing traditional infrastructures. But there are different ways to approach fabrics, all of which seem to have merit. What are the most important things to look for?
View Debate »go to commentsThe list of benefits for the Bring Your Own Device movement is long, but so is the list of associated risks. Is the time right to connect employee gadgets to the company network, or should we be more circumspect?
View Debate »go to commentsApple iOS and Google Android have emerged as the two most popular operating system platforms for mobile devices, both smartphones and tablets. They are also both backed by rich development and application ecosystems. There are, however, pluses and minuses when it comes to enterprise adoption. Which one has the leg up? We went to a company, MEDL Mobile, that develops for both to give us the opposing views.
View Debate »go to commentsProponents say government funding of broadband build out will help the US stay relevant in this online world, and ultimately benefit small business and translate into jobs. Critics say the private sector is doing just fine, thank you, and that the monies could be put to better use.
View Debate »go to commentsPersonal computing as we know it is changing as hordes of workers arrive with their favorite new tech tools and demand access to corporate resources. We ask two companies likely to play key roles in the flexible new world of end user computing – VMware and Citrix -- to spell out the future as they see it. Who do you think is better positioned to deliver on the promise? Cast your vote.
View Debate »go to commentsIn the cat and mouse game that is enterprise security, it is hard to determine who has the upper hand, so we put the question to two experts. Give their arguments a read, vote on the position you most agree with and add your thoughts in the forum below.
View Debate »go to commentsThe age old question about whether to go with best-of-breed products or integrated solutions is particularly salient when it comes to intrusion-prevention systems. Security is an area where you need the best possible point product, the best of breed folks argue. But the evolved threats require a more holistic view that can only be achieved by taking more factors into account, the integrated solution suppliers counter. Who is right? You decide.
View Debate »go to commentsWhen companies suffer a security breach today they face that core dilemma: Tell the world and hope the honesty helps others, or keep it under wraps to avoid tarnishing the brand and duck possible lawsuits? One thing is clear from the arguments below: It is time for the government to take the guesswork out of the equation.
View Debate »go to commentsMPLS is the Cadillac of enterprise WAN services, having earned its stripes as the link option of choice because of its reliability, flexibility and controls. But upstarts are saying that, with a little ingenuity, they can use Internet pipes to achieve the same ends at a better price.
View Debate »go to commentsThere is little argument that a defense in depth model is the best way to safeguard the enterprise, but which layer is most critical? Some would say the application layer will ultimately emerge as the Holy Grail, and that may prove true down the pike (a future debate?), but here we examine two of the more common approaches, the network layer vs. the endpoint.
View Debate »go to commentsDesktop virtualization promises to simplify management, increase efficiency and improve security, but it doesn’t come cheap and requires a big rethink. Will the latter forever relegate desktop virtualization to a few corners of the enterprise, or will the allure of the former convince corporations it is time to start from scratch?
View Debate »go to commentsThe iPad has taken the world by storm, but RIM hopes to parlay its dominant Blackberry enterprise presence into a meaningful tablet advantage with the new PlayBook. Which tablet wins?
View Debate »go to commentsNow that we've officially run out of IPv4 Internet address blocks, the calls to migrate to IPv6 are getting louder and more desperate, especially among ISPs who say companies that dally risk losing network visibility. Not so fast, say proponents of a more measured approach to migration. Get it wrong and you risk more than that.
View Debate »go to commentsNetwork neutrality regulation is necessary, proponents say, to ensure that ISPs treat all traffic in a neutral fashion and don't try to enrich themselves by meddling with the bits. Poppycock, naysayers respond. Service providers have always behaved and there is no reason to introduce regulations that could slow down this critical engine of commerce.
View Debate »go to comments